Head to head

Aqua vs Cortex Cloud: which reaches your whole cloud estate faster?

Short answer

On our coverage weights Cortex Cloud scores 7.75 against 7.45 for Aqua. Aqua scores higher on clouds and environments named and cost visibility before purchase; Cortex Cloud scores higher on agentless workload depth, path to first findings, risk context from day one, runtime layer when you need it and integrations and reach. Aqua names 7 of 8 environments and Cortex Cloud names 5.

Cortex Cloud is the product formerly sold as Prisma Cloud. Palo Alto Networks announced the merger with Cortex CDR on 13 February 2025.

Desk research from public vendor pages read in September 2026, updated 2026-10-11. Editorial assessment; we did not run the products.

How do the scores compare?

Aqua and Cortex Cloud by criterion
CriterionAquaCortex CloudHigher
Clouds and environments named 20%10.09.2Aqua
Agentless workload depth 25%6.87.6Cortex Cloud
Path to first findings 15%5.56.0Cortex Cloud
Risk context from day one 15%7.88.8Cortex Cloud
Runtime layer when you need it 10%9.09.2Cortex Cloud
Integrations and reach 7%7.69.0Cortex Cloud
Cost visibility before purchase 8%4.03.0Aqua
Total7.457.75Cortex Cloud

Aqua

7.45 / 10

Cortex Cloud

7.75 / 10

Which environments does each name?

Aqua Security

Aqua Security: names 7 of 8 environments: AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud, Alibaba Cloud, On-premises or private cloud, Disconnected (air-gapped).
A filled cell means the vendor's own pages name that environment. It is not a test of how well the product works there.

Aqua's pricing page lists "Support of AWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle and Alibaba Cloud environments"; its platform page names public, private and disconnected environments and states FedRAMP High authorization.

Source: Aqua pricing · Read 11 Oct 2026

How to read the strip

Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud (formerly Prisma Cloud)

Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud (formerly Prisma Cloud): names 5 of 8 environments: AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud, Alibaba Cloud.
A filled cell means the vendor's own pages name that environment. It is not a test of how well the product works there.

The Cortex Cloud posture page offers "agentless, full-coverage visibility across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, OCI, and Alibaba Cloud".

Source: Cortex Cloud posture management · Read 11 Oct 2026

How to read the strip

  • Named on the vendor's pages we reviewed
  • Not named on the pages we reviewed (this does not mean unsupported)

Named by both: AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud and Alibaba Cloud. Only Aqua: On-premises or private cloud and Disconnected (air-gapped). Only Cortex Cloud: none.

How does each see workloads?

Aqua

Coverage model
Agentless posture visibility; the platform's depth comes from kernel-layer runtime enforcement.
Runtime layer
Kernel-layer enforcement that blocks attacks without killing the container and preserves memory evidence.
Path to first findings
Agentless posture first; workload depth needs the enforcement layer.

Cortex Cloud

Coverage model
Posture, vulnerability and attack-surface modules work from cloud APIs; the pages reviewed lead with a runtime agent and do not name agentless workload scanning.
Runtime layer
Cortex Cloud Runtime Security, a performance-optimized agent, plus CDR from the Cortex CDR merger.
Path to first findings
API-based posture first; workload depth comes from the runtime agent.

What does each cost?

Aqua

Not published No list prices. Aqua says Dev Security pricing "is based on the number of code repositories" and Cloud Security is priced by workloads (EC2 instances, Fargate containers, Lambda functions); trial and demo on request.

Source: Aqua pricing · Read 11 Oct 2026

Cortex Cloud

Not published No public price; the Cortex Cloud page offers only Request a Demo. CNAPP is included at no additional cost for Cortex Cloud Runtime Security customers.

Source: Cortex Cloud posture management · Read 11 Oct 2026

What does each claim?

Aqua

Cortex Cloud

No speed, count or customer figure from Cortex Cloud is quoted on this site.

Which should you choose?

Choose Aqua if

you value coverage of the most clouds and environments and a deep runtime sensor for detection and blocking.

Best fit: Teams with private or disconnected environments and container pipelines.

Choose Cortex Cloud if

you value coverage of the most clouds and environments and a deep runtime sensor for detection and blocking.

Best fit: Palo Alto Networks estates and Prisma Cloud customers moving onto Cortex Cloud.

Frequently asked questions

Which scores higher for multi-cloud coverage, Aqua or Cortex Cloud?

Cortex Cloud scores 7.75 against 7.45 on our default weights. With equal weights the order is Cortex Cloud first (7.54 against 7.24). The coverage calculator lets you set your own weights.

Which clouds do Aqua and Cortex Cloud name?

Aqua: On the pages we reviewed: AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud, Alibaba Cloud, On-premises or private cloud and Disconnected (air-gapped). Aqua's pricing page lists "Support of AWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle and Alibaba Cloud environments"; its platform page names public, private and disconnected environments and states FedRAMP High authorization. Cortex Cloud: On the pages we reviewed: AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud and Alibaba Cloud. The Cortex Cloud posture page offers "agentless, full-coverage visibility across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, OCI, and Alibaba Cloud".

Which is cheaper?

Aqua: Not published. Cortex Cloud: Not published. Neither figure is a quote for your estate.